Looking for additional maintainer(s)!

[xomiamoore]

Hello all, we are searching for another maintainer or two for Pyzeebe! Please note our maintainer and reviewer expectations.

Please reply if you are interested :)

[yuval9313]

I've attempted to solve some issues but it seems no active maintainers are available and the original @JonatanMartens is revoked. Could you suggest a solution other than creating another pyzeebe?

[xomiamoore]

Hi @yuval9313. The only maintainer is @JonatanMartens (who still has Maintainer access, where are you seeing that it is revoked?)

I agree that I'd rather not fork pyzeebe, which is why we're looking for another Maintainer. Is that something you'd be able to take on?

[dimastbk]

Hi! I would like to be maintainer of pyzeebe. Problem is that my English is not very good, so I have some problems writing docs.

[xomiamoore]

@dimastbk Hi Dmitriy! Glad to hear it, I'll give you Maintainer permissions now! 🚀

No worries about your English, we are a global community so we have many contributors where English isn't their first language. If you ever want a proofreader, feel free to tag me and I am happy to review! :)

[dimastbk]

@xomiamoore thanks!

[dimastbk]

@xomiamoore could you remove these actions from the branch ruleset?

• unit-test (3.6)
• unit-test (3.7)

Now supported python 3.8+

[yuval9313]

Hey @xomiamoore I could certainly try

[dimastbk]

@xomiamoore and could you see PR rules? Now review from @JonatanMartens is required (see #397).

[xomiamoore]

@dimastbk Added you as an exception to the branch protections, you should be able to merge now!

[dimastbk]

@xomiamoore no, I can't merge #398

[dimastbk]

@xomiamoore Hi! Could you see #398 (comment) ?

[xomiamoore]

@dimastbk I saw you were able to merge it, did closing and reopening give you the right permissions?