Skip to content

fix(codeberg): missing elements#2113

Open
ninetailedtori wants to merge 10 commits intocatppuccin:mainfrom
ninetailedtori:cb-icon-squashed
Open

fix(codeberg): missing elements#2113
ninetailedtori wants to merge 10 commits intocatppuccin:mainfrom
ninetailedtori:cb-icon-squashed

Conversation

@ninetailedtori
Copy link
Contributor

@ninetailedtori ninetailedtori commented Jan 31, 2026

🔧 What does this fix? 🔧

  • Fixes forgejo being overwritten and as such appearing as a squashed codeberg logo. See footer of https://codeberg.org/librewolf for an example, but this issue happens on ALL repos. Looking at the "powered by" logo, which should be "forgejo", which with my fix now is.
  • Fixes codeberg icons.
  • Fixes navbar race-condition.
  • Adds support for entire homepage.

🗒 Checklist 🗒

…been overwritten as such.

Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the codeberg Codeberg label Jan 31, 2026
Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
ninetailedtori and others added 2 commits January 31, 2026 17:02
Co-authored-by: uncenter <uncenter@uncenter.dev>
Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
@ninetailedtori ninetailedtori changed the title fix(codeberg): branding icons fix(codeberg): homepage, forgejo icon Jan 31, 2026
@ninetailedtori ninetailedtori changed the title fix(codeberg): homepage, forgejo icon fix(codeberg): homepage, header+footer, forgejo icon Jan 31, 2026
Have to fix chroma inclusion, it's weird.

Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
@ninetailedtori ninetailedtori changed the title fix(codeberg): homepage, header+footer, forgejo icon fix(codeberg): missing elements Jan 31, 2026
Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
Signed-off-by: Toria <ninetailedtori@uwu.gal>
Copy link
Member

@uncenter uncenter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How much of this is still necessary?

@ninetailedtori
Copy link
Contributor Author

How much of this is still necessary?

Anything that's still in it is still necessary, I went through and checked against the upstream after fixing that issue.

@WalkQuackBack WalkQuackBack added 0.kind: bug Bug (i.e. unthemed components) 5.needs: staff-review A review by a staff member is required/needed labels Feb 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

0.kind: bug Bug (i.e. unthemed components) 5.needs: staff-review A review by a staff member is required/needed codeberg Codeberg

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants