Skip to content

Projections support #290

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 70 commits into from
May 24, 2025
Merged

Projections support #290

merged 70 commits into from
May 24, 2025

Conversation

ritvikrao
Copy link
Collaborator

Support for projections in charm4py

ZwFink added 30 commits October 9, 2020 10:46
@ZwFink
add pairwise addition/product
3f6da24
@ZwFink
add logical reductions
3ed6ce5
@ZwFink
add tests for section-based reductions
a180dca
@ZwFink
wip
16d1d34
@ZwFink
reductions are now optimized for numpy types
4ef355a
@ZwFink
numpy reductions always preferred when available
48e86ec
@ZwFink
added checks that single-value reductions work with sections
ba0679d
@ZwFink
add section reduction test
4ad6af4
@ZwFink
no fstrings allowed
5479d56
@ZwFink
remove unused time import
10175f0
@ZwFink
scookies -> _scookies
d01efd9
@ZwFink
add check so overflowing number of futures is not silent
fd04ae6
@ZwFink
cleanup
e207b36
@ZwFink
remove unused operator import
5531c5c
@ZwFink
use newest import
2e1b59c
@ZwFink
operator import is actually required
12a9f3b
@ZwFink
make new code flake8 compliant
16a79a1
@ZwFink
update
a3165e2
@ZwFink
add EP name registration
83ba3bb
@ZwFink
projections support for groups
4518ff8
@ZwFink
added CkRegisterMainChare to list of methods that are now correctly t…
1d8d216 
…raced
@ZwFink
section entry methods are now traced
6359e1c
@ZwFink
added registration to ArrayMaps
577a1bd
@ZwFink
add registration support for ArrayMap
8124479
@ZwFink
Add data required for projections to registration
0a22731
@ZwFink
Removed global entryNames/entryNamesLen. Unnecessary 'emStart'
689ad4f 
  parameter removed
@ZwFink
Moved entry method name tracking inside charmlib
d476e91
@ZwFink
Do we want to free the memory?
387bc2b
@ZwFink
Add '--enable-tracing' option to setup.py
122cb18
@ZwFink
Checkout the charm4py_projections branch for running tests
5c2df8d
adityapb and others added 25 commits January 15, 2024 17:48
@adityapb
Merge ray futures and charm futures
01fbe0e
@adityapb
Add store option to futures
e1a03df
@adityapb
Check future arguments in group methods
c66d28f
@adityapb
Try ray tasks implementation using charm4py pool
b4867a3
pool example
e1ed79b
Merge branch 'ray' of https://github.com/UIUC-PPL/charm4py into ray
f8194ac
@adityapb
Remove checking for futures from groups
ac0521b
@adityapb
Stateless tasks and exit calls work
fdd96e0
@adityapb
Working stateless tasks implementation
ec06b23
@adityapb
Add more examples
fb235bc
@adityapb
Fix ray.get calls from remote functions
c0bf94c
@adityapb
Add fib example to debug MPI issue
d0b8ab3
@adityapb
For small objects, store them at home
c5bbbc5
Merge branch 'main' into ray
a971227 
add arm build fix to ray branch
merge ray into projections support
44acea4
Revert "merge ray into projections support"
f2ac82b 
This reverts commit 44acea4, reversing
changes made to 4f65ec6.

undo merge of ray due to compilation issues
@ritvikrao
update projections branch
4fe8088
@ritvikrao
Merge branch 'main' into projections_support
498c1d3
@ritvikrao
remove generated files
9723c19
@ritvikrao
merge fixes
eb79fef
@ritvikrao
merge fixes 2
fbaf03a
@ritvikrao
merge fixes 3
e2e59c3
@ritvikrao
add back entry names to libRegisterFunc:
e83e029
@ritvikrao
merge
a93f6b1
merge
1c3d2aa
@ritvikrao ritvikrao merged commit e4c23a5 into main May 24, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@adityapb adityapb adityapb approved these changes

@ZwFink ZwFink Awaiting requested review from ZwFink

@matthiasdiener matthiasdiener Awaiting requested review from matthiasdiener

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@ritvikrao @adityapb @ZwFink