Skip to content

Fix duplicate artifact downloads (again) #176

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

matejchalk
Copy link
Contributor

@matejchalk matejchalk commented May 2, 2025

Missed an important detail in #174 πŸ˜… Artifacts are downloaded in parallel, so the promises have to be cached, the resolved values won't be available yet πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

@matejchalk matejchalk added the bug Something isn't working label May 2, 2025
@matejchalk matejchalk self-assigned this May 2, 2025
@matejchalk matejchalk requested a review from vmasek May 2, 2025 13:03
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 2, 2025

Code PushUp

πŸ₯³ Code PushUp report has improved – compared current commit d6cd05e with previous commit 0ce6883.

πŸ•΅οΈ See full comparison in Code PushUp portal πŸ”

🏷️ Categories

🏷️ Category ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score πŸ”„ Score change
Code coverage 🟑 58 🟑 59 ↑ +0.3
Bug prevention 🟒 100 🟒 100 –
Code style 🟒 100 🟒 100 –
Security πŸ”΄ 49 πŸ”΄ 49 –
Updates 🟒 97 🟒 97 –
πŸ‘ 1 group improved, πŸ‘ 2 audits improved

πŸ—ƒοΈ Groups

πŸ”Œ Plugin πŸ—ƒοΈ Group ⭐ Previous score ⭐ Current score πŸ”„ Score change
Code coverage Code coverage metrics 🟑 58 🟑 59 ↑ +0.3

11 other groups are unchanged.

πŸ›‘οΈ Audits

πŸ”Œ Plugin πŸ›‘οΈ Audit πŸ“ Previous value πŸ“ Current value πŸ”„ Value change
Code coverage Branch coverage πŸŸ₯ 37 % πŸŸ₯ 38 % ↑ +2.5 %
Code coverage Line coverage 🟨 57.2 % 🟨 57.5 % ↑ +0.4 %

170 other audits are unchanged.

@matejchalk matejchalk merged commit 2fc66b7 into main May 2, 2025
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants