Alternative Python Type-checkers #145
Open
+108
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yangm2
added
enhancement
KentShikama
reviewed
Jun 24, 2025
|
Is there one type-checker be configured to cover all three? If not all three, we could select either the strictest one or the one most relevant to other PRs? |
|
We could stick with |
KentShikama
reviewed
Jun 25, 2025
…nd ignores in session.py
yangm2
force-pushed
the
add-types-simplejson
branch
from
2c5998c to
203f6b0
Compare
apkostka
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Makefile&README.mdThis does not enable the other type-checkers in PR Checks. The 3 type-checkers flag different issues.
mypyis the grand-daddy of Python type-checking and is probably the most complete.pyreflyis a new implementation, similar in vintage totybut they each flag (or not) different issues.This may be useful for folks who are adding type annotations (e.g. #121)