chore(docs): move coder_parameter example

[stirby]

The coder_parameter data-source's code example was in the resources directory by mistake, moved.

Fixes #242.

---

Curious what the failed examples_test.go looks like so intentionally ignored.

[stirby]

@mtojek I removed the coder_parameter test from examples_test.go since that test targets resources specifically.

I find it interesting that the only two resources which don't generate code examples in the docs are prefixed with the provider.

Since coder_workspace_tags is in the correct directory, the problem may be deeper than a pathing issue.

I couldn't find any errors in the output of make gen's tfplugindocs call:

...
generating missing resource content
generating new template for "coder_app"
...
generating missing data source content
...
generating new template for data-source "coder_workspace_owner"
generating new template for data-source "coder_workspace_tags"
...
generating new template for data-source "coder_parameter"
generating missing function content
generating missing provider content
...

I also tried to add other resources to the examples_test.go, each of which failed.

---

All this said, I would actually like to take a stab at rewriting the examples_test.go. My fear is that the tests only pass with inclusion of the provider, which prevents the docs from correctly generating.

Mind taking a look?

[stirby]

For now, lazily duplicated resource examples test loop for data sources to test.

[mtojek]

Alright, I think I made the CI happy now. coder_parameter and coder_workspace_tags are in data-sources now, and examples_test.go is validating them.

I also tried to add other resources to the examples_test.go, each of which failed.

This may not be straightforward if examples depend on external fields or providers. For instance: coder_agent_instance uses google_compute_instance and we do not import gcp module.

EDIT:

Let me know if this is ready to review, and I will re-check everything 👍

[stirby]

I did some reading of other providers. Rarely do code examples reference other providers but it feels essential for our examples like coder_agent. I think we could revisit extending the testing someday but full coverage is not critical right now.

I think this is ready for your review.

Edit: trying one more thing.

[stirby]

Ended up over complicating. Should be good for your review.

[mtojek]

👍