Skip to content

Conversation

@Aarushjain2401
Copy link

@Aarushjain2401 Aarushjain2401 commented Oct 28, 2025

Fixes Issue

Changes proposed

Screenshots

Note to reviewers

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a new issue template to standardize issue submissions with predefined sections for issue type, description, reproduction steps, expected/actual behavior, suggested solutions, additional context, and maintainer notes.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 28, 2025

@Aarushjain2401 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Vivek Prajapati's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub issue template file is added at .github/ISSUES_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md containing YAML configuration and structured form sections for standardizing issue submissions. The template includes fields for issue type, description, reproduction steps, expected and actual behavior, solutions, context, and maintainer notes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
GitHub Issue Template
\.github/ISSUES_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md
New file added with YAML front matter (name, about, title, labels, assignees) and multi-section form structure for standardized issue reporting.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Static template file with no executable code or logic
  • Simple structural addition with no dependencies or integration points

Poem

🐰 A template so neat, with sections aligned,
To guide every issue through structure refined!
From type unto context, a pathway so clear,
No more scattered reports—just order right here! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description contains the correct template structure with all required sections present (Fixes Issue, Changes proposed, Screenshots, and Note to reviewers), but all content sections are completely empty and contain only template placeholder comments. The author has not filled in any substantive information about what changes are being made, why they are being made, or any supporting context. While the structure matches the template, the description lacks the actual content needed to understand the purpose and scope of the pull request. The author should fill in the "Changes proposed" section to describe what the new issue template includes and why it was added. The "Fixes Issue" section can be removed if this PR doesn't address a specific issue, and the "Screenshots" and "Note to reviewers" sections should be completed or removed as appropriate. At minimum, the description needs substantive content explaining the changes rather than just the empty template placeholders.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "Add general issue template for GitHub issues" is directly and clearly related to the main change in the changeset, which adds a new issue template file at .github/ISSUES_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md. The title is concise, specific, and accurately summarizes what was added without vague language or unnecessary details. A teammate reviewing the history would immediately understand the primary purpose of this change.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 715bcf7 and c5700d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/ISSUES_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/ISSUES_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md (3)

1-7: YAML front matter is well-structured.

The configuration follows GitHub's expected format for issue templates. The name, about, title, labels, and assignees fields are all appropriate.


9-50: Template sections are comprehensive and well-organized.

The template effectively covers the essential areas for issue reporting: type selection, description, reproduction steps, expected vs. actual behavior, proposed solutions, and additional context. The use of emojis and clear visual hierarchy improves usability, and HTML comments provide helpful guidance without cluttering the user-facing form.


1-50: Clarify discrepancy between PR description and template content.

The PR description mentions sections for "Closes #999" linking, "Fixes Issue", and "Changes proposed", but the actual template includes different sections (reproduction steps, expected/actual behavior, suggested solutions, etc.). Verify that the template content aligns with the intended purpose and update the PR description accordingly if needed.

Comment on lines +1 to +50
---
name: 📝 General Issue Template
about: Report a bug, suggest a feature, or request an enhancement
title: "[TYPE] Short issue summary"
labels: []
assignees: ""
---

## 🧭 Issue Type
<!-- Please select one -->
- [ ] 🐞 Bug
- [ ] 💡 Feature Request
- [ ] 🚀 Enhancement

---

## 📝 Description
<!-- A clear and concise description of the issue. -->

---

## 🔍 Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
1.
2.
3.

---

## ✅ Expected Behavior
<!-- What did you expect to happen? -->

---

## 🧩 Actual Behavior (for bugs)
<!-- What actually happened? Include screenshots or logs if applicable. -->

---

## 💡 Suggested Solution / Implementation
<!-- If you have an idea for how to fix or improve it, describe it here. -->

---

## 🧰 Additional Context
<!-- Add any other context, links, or screenshots about the issue here. -->

---

### 🏷️ Notes for Maintainers
<!-- Optional: Mention any labels or reviewers you recommend. -->
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Critical: Directory name should be ISSUE_TEMPLATE (singular), not ISSUES_TEMPLATE.

GitHub's native issue template discovery specifically looks for .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with a singular "ISSUE". The current path .github/ISSUES_TEMPLATE/ (plural "ISSUES") will prevent GitHub from automatically recognizing this template and offering it to users.

Move this file to .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md to enable proper template discovery.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/ISSUES_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md lines 1-50: The file is in the wrong
directory name — GitHub expects .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE (singular). Move this
file from .github/ISSUES_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md to
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/issue_template.md so GitHub will automatically discover
and present the template; ensure the filename and path are exact and update any
references if present.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 4, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
vigybag Ready Ready Preview Comment Nov 4, 2025 3:20pm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant