fix #1196
Closed
fix #1196
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Correct cipher suite identifier for TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, {0x13, 0x02} should correspond to TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384.Ref: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446#appendix-B.4
- remove the repeat check
- use correct number N instead of this->n
- move allochdl in list move operations
- Add format vs fmt benchmark (format_vs_fmt.cc) - Add teju vs dragonbox floating point benchmark (teju_vs_dragonbox.cc) - Add file I/O vs stdio benchmark (file_vs_stdio.cc) These benchmarks compare fast_io performance against fmt library, dragonbox/teju floating point implementations, and standard stdio for various I/O and formatting operations.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Correct cipher suite identifier for TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, {0x13, 0x02} should correspond to TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384.
remove the repeat check
use correct number N instead of this->n
move allochdl in list move operations