Simplify Issue Templates

[mrocklin]

I wonder if perhaps we have overused issue templates. I know that when I personally raise an issue I just remove all of the requirements and move on. I don't spend the time to list my Dask verison, Python version, what happened, what I expected to happen, etc..

I suspect that actually most of us do this. A beginner may not though, and I suspect that our requests intimidate them.

I propose that instead we point to a couple of docs like MCVE and then be done. Thoughts?

[mrocklin]

Also, for this repository it actually took me a minute to figure out how to raise an issue.

[mrocklin]

For reference, here is the bug report issue template.

<!-- Please include a self-contained copy-pastable example that generates the issue if possible.

Please be concise with code posted. See guidelines below on how to provide a good bug report:

- Craft Minimal Bug Reports http://matthewrocklin.com/blog/work/2018/02/28/minimal-bug-reports
- Minimal Complete Verifiable Examples https://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve

Bug reports that follow these guidelines are easier to diagnose, and so are often handled much more quickly.
-->

**What happened**:

**What you expected to happen**:

**Minimal Complete Verifiable Example**:

```python
# Put your MCVE code here
```

**Anything else we need to know?**:

**Environment**:

- Dask version:
- Python version:
- Operating System:
- Install method (conda, pip, source):

<!-- If you are reporting an issue such as scale stability, cluster deadlock.
Please provide a cluster dump state with this issue, by running client.dump_cluster_state()

https://distributed.dask.org/en/stable/api.html?highlight=dump_cluster_state#distributed.Client.dump_cluster_state

-->

<details>
<summary>Cluster Dump State:</summary>

</details>

[jrbourbeau]

Thanks @mrocklin. I agree there's room for improvement.

Also, for this repository it actually took me a minute to figure out how to raise an issue.

Agreed this isn't a great experience. It'd be great if the GitHub UI made it easier to see opening a blank issue is an option. See #277 for a proposed improvement.

I also opened up dask/.github#20 with some suggestions to our existing bug report template.

[jrbourbeau]

#277 and dask/.github#20 are in. @mrocklin is it okay to close this issue?

One additional follow-up I'd like to do is replace our current Python/package version requests with "Paste the output of dask version" once dask version exists

[jakirkham]

Wonder if we should move "Release" below "Report a security vulnerability" (given the former is effectively an internal issue)

[jrbourbeau]

That seems reasonable to me! Unfortunately, I couldn't find any information on how to change issue template ordering. Do others know how to do that?

[jakirkham]

In conda-forge, we numbered the issue template files ( conda-forge/.github#18 ), which seemed to work