-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
feat: use new file GF pfas udi dernier #163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughDeux clés du sous-objet Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
dbt_/models/intermediate/pfas/int__resultats_pfas_udi_dernier.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…dernier_ajout_ref
Modifications sur
int__resultats_pfas_udi_dernier
:is_20_pfas = 1
etnb_4_pfas = 4
Pour la somme des 20 PFAS et celle des 4 PFAS, j'ai choisi de garder les valeurs en dur pour l'instant car on ne dispose que de la limite de qualité pour les 20 PFAS mais pas pour les 4 PFAS. À vous de me dire si vous pensez que c'est le bon choix ou pas !
Summary by CodeRabbit