Add publish version method

[AgatheG]

[ch61775]

See corresponding PR on dip: https://github.com/dataiku/dip/pull/12374

[shortcut-integration]

This pull request has been linked to Clubhouse Story #61775: API Deployer: add a publish_package method to DSSAPIService.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.02%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	2.33 ⭐	2.32 ⭐	-0.01 👍
Method Length	31.02 ⭐	31.06 ⭐	0.04 👎
Working memory	8.43 🙂	8.42 🙂	-0.01 👍
Quality	79.91% ⭐	79.93% ⭐	0.02% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	1508	1521	13

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
dataikuapi/dss/apiservice.py	86.56% ⭐	85.96% ⭐	-0.60% 👎
dataikuapi/dss/project.py	79.45% ⭐	79.45% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
dataikuapi/dss/project.py	DSSProject.new_recipe	17 🙂	180 😞	28 ⛔	29.17% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
dataikuapi/dss/project.py	DSSProject.duplicate	2 ⭐	73 🙂	18 ⛔	60.05% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
dataikuapi/dss/project.py	DSSProject.create_prediction_ml_task	2 ⭐	75 🙂	14 😞	63.99% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
dataikuapi/dss/project.py	DSSProject.list_jupyter_notebooks	5 ⭐	69 🙂	12 😞	64.92% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
dataikuapi/dss/project.py	DSSProject.list_datasets	5 ⭐	63 🙂	12 😞	65.84% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.

[AgatheG]

Do we want to merge the refacto from #141?

[instanceofme]

Hmm not in this PR. It touches other places than the scope here.

[AgatheG]

Yep that was my thought as well. Do we simply merge the sourcery PR into release/9.0 or should we open a CH card to do it?

[instanceofme]

Maybe we want to wait until release/9.0 has been published as 9.0.1, but otherwise LGTM

[kevanescence]

@instanceofme @marchelleboid can we merge this ?

[marchelleboid]

@instanceofme @marchelleboid can we merge this ?

Since 9.0.1 has been released, seems like it can be merged now. Might want to double check with @AgatheG though.

[kevanescence]

In fact as noticed by @instanceofme it adds a new method only available in DSS 9.0.2.
So let's wait for 9.0.2 to land.