Replies: 1 comment 8 replies
-
Hi @lipsa7! What model are you using and how does your Pipeline look like? It seems that the question you asked cannot be answered by the provided text snippet. Have you tried setting the parameter |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
8 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The model is not giving me the answer I want.
What is HT:LT ratio of Andhra Pradesh East discom?
<Answer {'answer': '13%).', 'type': 'extractive', 'score': 0.9178509712219238, 'context': 'tically higher than the utility \nwith the next highest rate (MP East, at 13%). This \ncould be attributed to unbalanced load, lack of \na protection sys', 'offsets_in_document': [{'start': 235620, 'end': 235625}], 'offsets_in_context': [{'start': 73, 'end': 78}], 'document_ids': ['dc508056555e17df501653fd820cc485'], 'meta': {'name': 'SPI_Electrification_15.pdf'}}>
It's taking answer from the following paragraph which has got nothing to do with the question asked.
Text from pdf:
the surveyed utilities
reported an average DT failure rate of 11%, with
three utilities in Gujarat (Central, South, and
North) having low DT failure rates mainly due
to adoption of better maintenance practices.
MP West has the highest DT failure rate, which
at 38% is dramatically higher than the utility
with the next highest rate (MP East, at 13%). This
could be attributed to unbalanced load, lack of
a protection system, and poor workmanship in
the installed DTs.
In its other answers also, it's not giving me the relevant answer to my question.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions