Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jun 27, 2025

This PR addresses the low code coverage issue by adding 49 new tests, increasing the test count from 86 to 135 tests (+57% increase).

Problem

The repository had low code coverage due to several public extension methods lacking any test coverage, particularly in IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensions.

Solution

Added comprehensive test coverage for all previously untested public methods:

New Test Files Created

  • IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.First.cs (4 tests)
  • IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.FirstOrDefault.cs (4 tests)
  • IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.GetInvokedMethod.cs (5 tests)
  • IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.GetInvocationConsequences.cs (5 tests)
  • IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.GetInvocationConsequenceStatements.cs (5 tests)
  • IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.TraverseStatement.cs (5 tests)

Edge Case Test Files

  • StringExtensionsTests.EdgeCases.cs (10 additional tests)
  • InvocationDescriptionExtensionsTests.EdgeCases.cs (5 additional tests)
  • IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.EdgeCases.cs (6 additional tests)

Test Coverage Areas

Null reference protection - All methods properly validate null inputs
Empty collection handling - Proper behavior with empty sequences
Case sensitivity validation - Ensures ordinal string comparisons work correctly
Parameter matching - Complex scenarios with optional parameters
Recursive traversal - Statement traversal with nested structures
Boundary conditions - Edge cases like single characters, special characters

Key Methods Now Covered

Previously untested public methods that now have full coverage:

  • First(IEnumerable<TypeDescription>, string)
  • FirstOrDefault(IEnumerable<TypeDescription>, string)
  • GetInvokedMethod(IEnumerable<TypeDescription>, InvocationDescription)
  • GetInvocationConsequences(IEnumerable<TypeDescription>, InvocationDescription)
  • GetInvocationConsequenceStatements(IEnumerable<TypeDescription>, InvocationDescription)
  • TraverseStatement(IEnumerable<TypeDescription>, Statement)

Validation

All 135 tests pass with no failures, ensuring the new tests are robust and the existing functionality remains intact.

Fixes #5.


💬 Share your feedback on Copilot coding agent for the chance to win a $200 gift card! Click here to start the survey.

@eNeRGy164 eNeRGy164 added the code quality Improvements to code style, structure, or coverage without adding new features or fixing bugs label Jun 27, 2025
Copilot AI and others added 2 commits June 27, 2025 12:34
…ing methods

Co-authored-by: eNeRGy164 <10671831+eNeRGy164@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: eNeRGy164 <10671831+eNeRGy164@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Code coverage is low Significantly improve code coverage by adding comprehensive test suite for extension methods Jun 27, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from eNeRGy164 June 27, 2025 12:42
Copilot finished work on behalf of eNeRGy164 June 27, 2025 12:42
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 27, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15926884347

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+24.3%) to 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 15906079440: 24.3%
Covered Lines: 221
Relevant Lines: 221

💛 - Coveralls

@eNeRGy164 eNeRGy164 marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2025 12:47
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 27, 2025 12:47
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR significantly improves code coverage by introducing 49 new tests that cover public extension methods, ensuring robust null checks, boundary conditions, and complex scenarios.

  • Added tests for string manipulation, generic type handling, and case sensitivity.
  • Covered recursive traversal, invocation matching, and consequence extraction in extension methods.
  • Enhanced tests for methods First and FirstOrDefault along with various edge cases.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 9 out of 9 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/StringExtensionsTests.EdgeCases.cs Adds tests for string formatting and generic type evaluation.
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/InvocationDescriptionExtensionsTests.EdgeCases.cs Covers case sensitivity and parameter matching in invocation extensions.
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.TraverseStatement.cs Tests recursive traversal with Switch and If statement scenarios.
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.GetInvokedMethod.cs Validates method retrieval based on type and method names.
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.GetInvocationConsequences.cs Ensures correct extraction of invocation consequences and nested invocations.
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.GetInvocationConsequenceStatements.cs Tests inclusion of both invocation and non-invocation statements.
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.FirstOrDefault.cs Checks correct return of the first matching type or null when not found.
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.First.cs Verifies the behavior of the First method including exception throwing for missing types.
tests/DendroDocs.Client.Tests/Extensions/IEnumerableTypeDescriptionExtensionsTests.EdgeCases.cs Adds various edge cases such as case sensitivity and nested switch/if scenarios.

Copy link
Member

@eNeRGy164 eNeRGy164 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of seperate "EdgeCase" files, combine methods in their respective method scoped files.

Co-authored-by: eNeRGy164 <10671831+eNeRGy164@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Jun 27, 2025

Instead of seperate "EdgeCase" files, combine methods in their respective method scoped files.

Done! I've consolidated all edge case tests from the separate EdgeCase files into their respective method-scoped files and removed the EdgeCase files. All 135 tests are still passing. The changes are in commit c629636.

Copilot AI requested a review from eNeRGy164 June 27, 2025 12:59
Copilot finished work on behalf of eNeRGy164 June 27, 2025 12:59
@eNeRGy164 eNeRGy164 merged commit 83fd3f2 into main Jun 27, 2025
4 checks passed
@eNeRGy164 eNeRGy164 deleted the copilot/fix-5 branch June 27, 2025 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

code quality Improvements to code style, structure, or coverage without adding new features or fixing bugs

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Code coverage is low

3 participants