You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While configuring notifications at the environment level, users can select all current and future pipelines for deployment notifications. However, the same functionality is not available for build notifications.
By implementing this feature, users can ensure that all build notifications are consistently configured at the environment level without manual intervention. This will improve efficiency, reduce configuration overhead, and prevent missed notifications for newly created pipelines.
🔄️ Alternative
No response
👀 Have you spent some time to check if this issue has been raised before?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🔖 Feature description
While configuring notifications at the environment level, users can select all current and future pipelines for deployment notifications. However, the same functionality is not available for build notifications.
PRs
Flag (orches)
ENABLE_NOTIFIER_V2 = "true"
It will enable the new endpoint, notification should work in either way, flag on/off
Dev Tasks
NotificationRestHandler
and Service - Orchestrator✅ Test Cases Checklist
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lt5IVZtQUs400ykL_cLZQGQz553qgmYrtHVtYKeNZ1I/edit?gid=594123733#gid=594123733
CI (Build) Pipeline Events:
CD (Deployment) Pipeline Events:
Pre/Post CD Events:
Approval Events:
Security Events:
Pipeline Status Events:
Scoop Events:
🎤 Pitch / Usecases
By implementing this feature, users can ensure that all build notifications are consistently configured at the environment level without manual intervention. This will improve efficiency, reduce configuration overhead, and prevent missed notifications for newly created pipelines.
🔄️ Alternative
No response
👀 Have you spent some time to check if this issue has been raised before?
🏢 Have you read the Code of Conduct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: