Feature request: Ruby on Rails application (puma)

[WaKeMaTTa]

Example: https://itnext.io/docker-rails-puma-nginx-postgres-999cd8866b18#d08e

[0xb4lint]

@WaKeMaTTa could you please help me what's the difference between a regular reverse proxy and a Ruby on Rails reverse proxy?

[WaKeMaTTa]

@valentinxxx Ok. When I have time, I will put in this issue all the differences.

[Trozz]

looking at the example, the primary difference appears to be around serving static content directly from nginx and only going to the proxy for dynamic pages.

[WaKeMaTTa]

The static pages are located in /public folder of the application.

[dush]

What about using Passenger https://www.phusionpassenger.com/docs/tutorials/deploy_to_production/deploying_your_app/oss/ownserver/ruby/nginx/#rails_configuring-nginx-and-passenger

[DRBragg]

I second using passenger!

Either way, I'd love to see this tool with RoR setup. I've gotten pretty good at doing it manually (my way at least, no idea if it's correct) but this is a great tool.

[huseyin]

Rails uses Puma by default. I think this tool can support Puma first.

[colinrubbert]

Has there been any progress on this? Would love to see an addition of RoR w/Puma in the configurator.