[New Model]: ProductCarbonFootprint_For_BatterySupplier

[LuisRickert]

Model Description

Preliminary datamodel to provide battery related to the Deletgated-Act PCF information along the value chain.

The model is preliminary since the Delegated has yet to be finalized and there may be changes upon the final release of the delegated act.

Relevant Standards

No relevant Standards since the datamodel is preliminary

Example Data

{
  "manufacturerPartId": "yedUsFwdkelQbxeTeQOvaScfqIOOmaa",
  "contentC02Metals": [
    "Material: Nickel, Specific Content: 50.5%, EV_Mat: 4.9 kg CO₂e/kg ,Erecycled_Mat: 2.3 kg CO₂e/kg; Material: Cobalt, Specific Content: 6.0%, EV_Mat: 13.0 kg CO₂e/kg ,Erecycled_Mat: 4.2 kg CO₂e/kg"
  ],
  "legalBpn": "BPNL0I9SvqmgHJQ1",
  "productQualityParameter": [
    "purity of active material: 99.8%; specific capacity of NMC811: 200 mAh/g; energy density of cells: 250 Wh/kg"
  ],
  "cxPCFValues": {
    "pcfPerformanceClass": "B+",
    "webLinkToCarbonFootPrintStudy": "https://www.example.com/study.pdf",
    "sharesPerStage": {
      "stage1RawMaterialAquisitionPreProcessing": {
        "stageValue": 0
      },
      "stage2MainProductProduction": {
        "stageValue": 0
      },
      "absPcfValue": {
        "stageValue": 0
      },
      "stage3Distribution": {
        "stageValue": 0
      },
      "stage4EndOfLifeRecycling": {
        "stageValue": 0
      },
      "declaredUnit": "C02KG/KG"
    }
  },
  "validityPeriod": {
    "validityPeriodStart": "2025-09-19T10:16:25.463+02:00",
    "validityPeriodEnd": "2025-09-19T10:16:25.463+02:00"
  },
  "customerPartID": "eOMtThyhVNLWUZNRcBaQKxI",
  "siteBpn": "BPNSQV6Euk5do5m2",
  "primaryDataShare": 56.12,
  "geographicalRepresentativeness": 2,
  "dataQualityRating": 4,
  "secondaryEmissionFactorSources": [
    {
      "secondaryEmissionFactorSource": "ecoinvent 3.8"
    }
  ],
  "timerelatedRepresentativeness": 3,
  "technologicalRepresentativeness": 3
}

MS1 Criteria

• The proposed aspect model does not exist already
• The proposed aspect model does not extend an existing aspect but introduces completely new functionality
• The proposal references a Catena-X use case
• Relevant standards are mentioned/linked
• A first draft of the data structure is provided in an example
• A modeling steward has been assigned @LuisRickert

[BirgitBoss]

There is a joint expert modelling group Catena-X/IDTA/BatteryPass that are working exactly on this.
The corresponding models are currently in review:
https://github.com/admin-shell-io/smt-semantic-models/tree/smt-xg/BatteryPass_Working
including:
https://github.com/admin-shell-io/smt-semantic-models/tree/smt-xg/BatteryPass_Working/io.admin-shell.idta.batterypass.carbon_footprint

The corresponding standard is DIN 91100 for the BatteryPass.

==> no need for a new Aspect Model

[manourym]

Hi Birgit, this is linked to https://github.com/catenax-eV/sig-roadmap/issues/593

I got feedback that some values are still missing regarding the pcf ammendment to te battery regulation (here) that need to be tested already with the suppliers. Therefore, this model shall be created. I will put the feedback also in the batterypass review. Here the feedback:

Attribute	Description	Refrence to Annex of Regulation Draft
Specific content and the carbon footprint of metals and metal salts	The specific content and the carbon footprint of metals and metal salts that are targeted by the default battery cell recycling process, 6, at least regarding steel, aluminium, copper, cobalt, nickel, manganese, lithium, graphite, silicon, titanium, vanadium, silver, gold, platinum group metals and phosphorous. If such metals and metal salts contain recycled content, the carbon footprint of EV_Mat and Erecycled_Mat as defined in section 2.6 shall be provided.	2.3.1. Mandatory company-specific processes
Product quality parameters	Product quality parameters affecting product carbon footprint, such as purity or specific capacity	2.3.1. Mandatory company-specific processes
Technological Representativeness – TeR	The degree to which the data reflects the actual technology(ies) used. A value between 1 and 5.	2.3.6. Data quality ratings
Geographical Representativeness – GeR	Geographical representativeness. The degree to which the data reflects the actual geographic location of the manufacturing process. A value between 1 and 5.	2.3.6. Data quality ratings
Time-related Representativeness – TiR	The degree to which the reference period is for the data set is close to the issue date.  A value between 1 and 5.	2.3.6. Data quality ratings
Data Quality Rating - DQR	Data Quality Rating (DQR) calculated based on the DQR criteria TeR, TiR and GeR.	2.3.6. Data quality ratings