Skip to content

Conversation

@marvinborner
Copy link
Member

Related: issue #801. Eventually we should do these kinds of transformations automatically, in the future we should do something smarter.

@marvinborner marvinborner force-pushed the fix/issue801 branch 2 times, most recently from 83bf575 to 730d719 Compare October 2, 2025 16:50
@phischu
Copy link
Collaborator

phischu commented Oct 2, 2025

The source of the problem is that recursive object definitions (with new) are not supported by the llvm backend. It is possible to work around this, and also to automate this workaround.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants