Reject RECONNECT_UNLESS_SKIP_UNAVAILABLE in CPS
#132955
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DisconnectedStrategy.RECONNECT_UNLESS_SKIP_UNAVAILABLE is unsupported in CPS, as skip_unavailable itself is unsupported in CPS. This change adds a check in RemoteClusterService.getRemoteClusterClient() rejecting RECONNECT_UNLESS_SKIP_UNAVAILABLE if stateless is enabled and adds a unit test case for it. Resolves: ES-12610
JeremyDahlgren
added
>non-issue
Team:Distributed Coordination
|
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed-coordination (Team:Distributed Coordination) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DisconnectedStrategy.RECONNECT_UNLESS_SKIP_UNAVAILABLEis unsupported in CPS, asskip_unavailableitself is unsupported in CPS. This change adds a check inRemoteClusterService.getRemoteClusterClient()rejectingRECONNECT_UNLESS_SKIP_UNAVAILABLEif stateless is enabled and adds a unit test case for it. This PR is a split from work initially done in #132478.Resolves: ES-12610