Skip to content

Surface room topics to interface #3250

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Half-Shot opened this issue May 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Surface room topics to interface #3250

Half-Shot opened this issue May 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
T-Enhancement New features, changes in functionality, performance boosts, user-facing improvements X-Needs-Design May require input from the design team X-Needs-Product More input needed from the Product team

Comments

@Half-Shot
Copy link
Member

Your use case

What would you like to do?

Surface the current meeting "topic" in the interface.

Why would you like to do it?

We often use the same group call to discuss our plans. Sometimes this is having a coffee, sometimes this is discussing some features, sometimes this is taking over the world. It would be nice if this could be visible on screen so that everyone is on the same page.

How would you like to achieve it?

Room topics are great, well supported by other clients and "cheap" to use. That would be my preference.

Have you considered any alternatives?

No response

Additional context

No response

@Half-Shot Half-Shot added the T-Enhancement New features, changes in functionality, performance boosts, user-facing improvements label May 6, 2025
@fkwp fkwp added X-Needs-Design May require input from the design team X-Needs-Product More input needed from the Product team labels May 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-Enhancement New features, changes in functionality, performance boosts, user-facing improvements X-Needs-Design May require input from the design team X-Needs-Product More input needed from the Product team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants