-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
add support for sen66 #4710
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: current
Are you sure you want to change the base?
add support for sen66 #4710
Conversation
WalkthroughThe change updates the sensor platform documentation in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/sensor/sen5x.rst (3)
8-8
: Enhance Sensor Model Description
The updated text now clearly includes the Sen66 alongside the existing SEN50, SEN54, and SEN55 models. For added clarity, consider briefly noting any key differences or unique features of the Sen66 model (e.g., measurements supported or its enhanced default address) to help users distinguish between the models.
93-96
: New CO2 Configuration Variable
The addition of the optional co2 configuration variable specific to Sen66 is implemented correctly. To further assist users, you might add details on the expected unit (e.g., ppm) or value range if applicable, ensuring clarity on its usage compared to other sensor options.
145-145
: Improve I²C Address Readability
The update clarifying the default I²C address for Sen66 is clear. However, a minor formatting adjustment is recommended—add a space after the period for better readability.- Defaults to ``0x69``.But for Sen66 the default is ``0x6b`` + Defaults to ``0x69``. But for Sen66, the default is ``0x6b``
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/sensor/sen5x.rst
(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**`: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
**
: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
components/sensor/sen5x.rst
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently. This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because of that and will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this is a feature matched with a PR in https://github.com/esphome/esphome, please target your PR to the next
branch and rebase.
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍 |
Description:
Added support for sen66 sensors based on sen5x
Related issue (if applicable): fixes esphome/feature-requests#2995
Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#<esphome PR number goes here>
Checklist:
I am merging into
next
because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
current
because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/index.rst
when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.