Skip to content

Support "in-place" lists of contents #57

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
chrisjsewell opened this issue May 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Support "in-place" lists of contents #57

chrisjsewell opened this issue May 6, 2021 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

I think the best way forward is to use the simple lists that @AakashGfude has put together and we can open an issue to replace it with a more pure latex implementation using some latex package to generate simple local contents listings. @AakashGfude can you open a PR to add in this support.

this should not be that difficult:

  1. The point of this PR, and thus any future work, is that for builder specific extensions you can "gather" information in a transform, but you cannot implement any modifications of the AST until a post-transform.
  2. The list addition must be optional, and should be one option of how to generate an in-page toc.

Originally posted by @chrisjsewell in #55 (comment)

@mmcky
Copy link
Member

mmcky commented Apr 1, 2022

@AakashGfude this is now supported right. We can close this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants