Skip to content

Fix cases of multiple stubs on the same method on a mock #14649

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

paulb777
Copy link
Member

@paulb777 paulb777 commented Apr 3, 2025

See internal cl/743729906

Copy link
Contributor

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

@paulb777
Copy link
Member Author

paulb777 commented Apr 3, 2025

/gemini summary

Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses an issue where multiple stubs were being defined on the same method of a mock object in the FirebaseCore testing suite. The change replaces OCMStub with OCMExpect in the FIRBundleUtilTest.m file. This ensures that the mock expectations are properly verified during testing, preventing unexpected behavior when multiple stubs are defined for the same method.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Replaces OCMStub with OCMExpect to fix issues with multiple stubs on the same mock method.
  • Testing: Ensures mock expectations are properly verified in FIRBundleUtilTest.m.

Changelog

  • FirebaseCore/Tests/Unit/FIRBundleUtilTest.m
    • Replaced OCMStub with OCMExpect for bundleIdentifier method calls on self.mockBundle to ensure proper mock verification.

Activity

  • The pull request was created by paulb777 to address an internal issue (cl/743729906).
  • gemini-code-assist[bot] provided a welcome message with information on how to use Gemini Code Assist.
  • paulb777 requested a summary from gemini-code-assist[bot].

@paulb777
Copy link
Member Author

paulb777 commented Apr 3, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request addresses an issue where multiple stubs were being set on the same method of a mock object in the tests. This change replaces OCMStub with OCMExpect to ensure that the expected number of calls to the mocked method are verified. This is a good change to improve the accuracy and reliability of the tests.

Summary of Findings

  • OCMStub vs OCMExpect: The change replaces OCMStub with OCMExpect. OCMStub only stubs the method, whereas OCMExpect verifies that the method is called the expected number of times. This is important for ensuring that the code under test is behaving as expected.

Merge Readiness

The code changes are well-done and address the issue of multiple stubs on the same method. I recommend merging this pull request after addressing the review comments. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

@google-oss-bot
Copy link

1 Warning
⚠️ Did you forget to add a changelog entry? (Add #no-changelog to the PR description to silence this warning.)

Generated by 🚫 Danger

@paulb777 paulb777 requested a review from ncooke3 April 4, 2025 00:23
@paulb777 paulb777 enabled auto-merge (squash) April 4, 2025 00:23
@paulb777 paulb777 merged commit e60f379 into main Apr 4, 2025
43 checks passed
@paulb777 paulb777 deleted the pb-ocmock-fix branch April 4, 2025 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants