Skip to content

Make volume package usable from non-Firecracker runtimes #631

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2022

Conversation

kzys
Copy link
Contributor

@kzys kzys commented May 18, 2022

It isn't fully transparent though.

Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato katokazu@amazon.com

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@kzys kzys requested a review from a team as a code owner May 18, 2022 21:39
@kzys kzys force-pushed the volume-runc branch 2 times, most recently from 334dc1a to 6794724 Compare May 18, 2022 23:08
It isn't fully transparent though.

Signed-off-by: Kazuyoshi Kato <katokazu@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@Kern-- Kern-- left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is fine for now, but I'd like to see a follow up (maybe just an issue for now) with a deeper dive on if we could make this more transparent. Could we do it with the abstractions we have today? Is there a way to extend the containerd abstractions to allow this?

@kzys
Copy link
Contributor Author

kzys commented May 19, 2022

@Kern-- Yeah. containerd 1.7's sandbox might help, but it couldn't take something like fc-cd's DriveMount. Filed #634.

@kzys kzys merged commit 18dc437 into firecracker-microvm:main May 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants