Add bitwuzla as a valid solver #1013
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I want some evidence on whether this actually helps before merging. Also, we already allow setting the solver per function. You can put a |
nilehmann
added
bug
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I want to add this solver to liquid fixpoint. See here: ucsd-progsys/liquid-fixpoint#740
It would be nice if we could propogate this back to a flux option!
Also good for me to note here: Before merging this in (if we want to), we would almost certainly need an option to configure a function to use a specific solver.
Bitwuzlabasically only works on the theory of Arrays and BVs - I don't think it supports QFLIA at all.