[Rust] mcap 0.14.x introduced a breaking change in mcap::Schema. Consider using major versions to communicate this.

[photex]

Good morning,

I know everyone has big opinion on semantic versioning. But I think it's important to maybe reconsider the endless major version 0.x.

Specifically, between 0.13 and 0.14 there was a breaking change by adding the id field to the mcap::Schema struct.

My opinion is that any breaking change no matter how minor should warrant a major version increment. I know that there is a tendency in the broader rust community of crate authors to place a lot of emphasis on the big 1.x being a special version indicating stability among other things.
But in practice, you've already released this crate and an associated product into the world and other developers depend on it. It is more reliable to communicate a breaking change using major versions.

Anyway food for thought.

Cheers,
Chip