Skip to content

Conversation

ccwienk
Copy link
Member

@ccwienk ccwienk commented Jul 14, 2025

see: https://gardener.github.io/cc-utils/github_actions.html

Caveat: this commit does not yet contain migration of integrationtests (currently part of concourse-pipeline), and testmachinery-runs (currently not part of concourse-pipeline).

How to categorize this PR?

/area TODO
/kind TODO

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

migrate CICD-Pipeline to GitHub-Actions

@ccwienk ccwienk requested a review from a team as a code owner July 14, 2025 17:55
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the needs/review Needs review label Jul 14, 2025
@ccwienk ccwienk added reviewed/do-not-merge Has no approval for merging as it may break things, be of poor quality or have (ext.) dependencies and removed needs/review Needs review labels Jul 14, 2025
@gardener-robot
Copy link

@ccwienk Labels area/todo, kind/todo do not exist.

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Jul 14, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 14, 2025
@ccwienk
Copy link
Member Author

ccwienk commented Jul 14, 2025

note: this pullrequest does not yet contain migration of integration-tests. I created it nonetheless, as I already did part of the migration, so missing parts can be added later.

@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jul 14, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 14, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jul 14, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jul 14, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jul 14, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jul 14, 2025
@shreyas-s-rao shreyas-s-rao modified the milestones: v0.38.0, v0.39.0 Jul 30, 2025
see: https://gardener.github.io/cc-utils/github_actions.html

Caveat: this commit does not yet contain migration of integrationtests
(currently part of concourse-pipeline), and testmachinery-runs
(currently not part of concourse-pipeline).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/review Needs review reviewed/do-not-merge Has no approval for merging as it may break things, be of poor quality or have (ext.) dependencies size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants