Skip to content

Conversation

@RohitR311
Copy link
Collaborator

@RohitR311 RohitR311 commented Oct 27, 2025

What this PR does?

Fixes the UI bug occurring on performing any capture action.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Disabled vertical scrolling in the recording content area, changing how overflow content is displayed.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Walkthrough

Modified the inner container's overflow CSS property from auto to hidden in RecordingPage.tsx, disabling vertical scrolling within the BrowserContent/InterpretationLog region while preserving its 100% height constraint.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Overflow Style Update
src/pages/RecordingPage.tsx
Changed inner container overflow from auto to hidden, preventing vertical scrolling in the content area while maintaining full height

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Verify the overflow:hidden change doesn't break intended scroll behavior in related UI sections
  • Confirm this aligns with the intended user experience for the BrowserContent/InterpretationLog region
  • Check for any side effects on adjacent scrollable elements

Suggested labels

Type: Bug, Scope: UI/UX, Scope: Recorder

Suggested reviewers

  • amhsirak

Poem

🐰 A scroll that once danced now rests still,
Hidden overflow bends to our will,
No more content tumbles beyond sight,
The container holds fast, snug and tight!
A simple change, yet UI delight ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title "fix: recorder ui bug" is directly related to the changeset, as the pull request objective explicitly states it fixes a UI bug in the recorder section, and the change modifies RecordingPage.tsx. However, the title is somewhat generic and lacks specificity about what the actual bug is or what the fix entails. While it's not as vague as "misc updates," a teammate scanning the commit history would have limited information about the nature of the UI bug or the specific solution implemented, requiring them to open the PR for context. Consider revising the title to be more specific about what was fixed, such as "fix: disable vertical scrolling in recording content area" or "fix: recorder UI scrolling issue on capture action," which would provide clearer context about the nature of the bug and the solution without requiring teammates to view the full PR details.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acba072 and 29146da.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/pages/RecordingPage.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/pages/RecordingPage.tsx (1)

160-160: Change is safe based on component structure analysis - no content will be hidden.

The child components properly handle their own scrolling:

  • BrowserWindow is explicitly sized to fit the viewport dimensions and won't overflow
  • InterpretationLog contains multiple internal containers with overflow: 'auto' (tables and screenshot display box), ensuring scrollable content remains accessible
  • The pattern matches existing codebase conventions (outer container with overflow: 'hidden', inner components with overflow: 'auto')

The change from overflow: 'auto' to overflow: 'hidden' won't prevent access to content since the child components are properly constrained or internally scrollable.

Note: The PR description remains vague about the specific UI bug being fixed, but the code change itself is structurally sound.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Member

@amhsirak amhsirak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@RohitR311 the layout shift still happens. This PR does not fix it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants