Skip to content

remove unnecessary duplicate code #34733

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 17, 2025

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Jun 15, 2025

No description provided.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jun 15, 2025
@lunny lunny added the type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality. label Jun 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label Jun 15, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jun 17, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jun 17, 2025
@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit 1e644e3 into go-gitea:main Jun 17, 2025
26 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.25.0 milestone Jun 17, 2025
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/remove_duplicate_code branch June 17, 2025 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code type/refactoring Existing code has been cleaned up. There should be no new functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants