This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

Description
it seems there will be a numbering scheme of new-electronics DIFs covering the [0-100] range.
ie: we'll need to handle DIF=0.
previously, we used (in dif-dump) the "special" value DIF=0 to mean "all DIFs".
we should start to plan for replacing that special value with something else.
-1 comes to mind (but is that uint8(-1) or uint16(-1) ?)
is this only segregated to dif-dump or should we need to have a more pervasive approach?