Skip to content

Async support #368

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
lengau opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 20 comments
Open

Async support #368

lengau opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 20 comments
Labels
help wanted We'd love to have community involvement on this issue. priority: p3 Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@lengau
Copy link

lengau commented Jun 30, 2020

This is based on #156 and #224, but I can't reopen those.

In #156 this was marked as a priority but Python 2.7 support was listed as a blocker. As the earliest version of Python now supported is 3.5 (which is after asyncio was introduced), it seems this blocker has been removed. Since a lot of Python applications (especially webapps) are moving over to async, it would be nice not to have to make workarounds to implement Google Maps support.
@lengau lengau added triage me I really want to be triaged. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. labels Jun 30, 2020
@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt added help wanted We'd love to have community involvement on this issue. priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. and removed triage me I really want to be triaged. labels Jun 30, 2020
@hzlmn
Copy link

hzlmn commented Jul 7, 2020

Hello, i made a small wrapper. https://github.com/hzlmn/aiogmaps if it reasonable i can init some work on async client to possibly merge it together. Having async client is really critical as more and more tools are getting async apis even Django pretty close to it.

@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt added priority: p3 Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release. and removed priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. labels Jul 9, 2020
@jpoehnelt
Copy link
Contributor

I have plans to do this. Hopefully later this year.

@hzlmn
Copy link

hzlmn commented Jul 10, 2020

Great, thanks 👐

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 7, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Please comment here if it is still valid so that we can reprioritize. Thank you!

@stale stale bot added the stale label Nov 7, 2020
@Rich1000
Copy link

Any update on this?

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Nov 11, 2020
@jpoehnelt
Copy link
Contributor

I'm currently writing an openapi3 spec which should make the process easier.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 19, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Please comment here if it is still valid so that we can reprioritize. Thank you!

@stale stale bot added the stale label Mar 19, 2021
@Rich1000
Copy link

Still interested

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Mar 20, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 20, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Please comment here if it is still valid so that we can reprioritize. Thank you!

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jul 20, 2021
@lengau
Copy link
Author

lengau commented Jul 22, 2021

Commenting here because this issue is still valid.

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jul 22, 2021
@PyDataBlog
Copy link

Issue is still valid

@zporteous
Copy link

Still interested! 💯 :)

@jpoehnelt
Copy link
Contributor

jpoehnelt commented Dec 3, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Still looking to rewrite this library using the openapi spec at https://github.com/googlemaps/openapi-specification. I'm currently investigating client code generators for openapi. Tracking in #422.

@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt pinned this issue Dec 3, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 16, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. Please comment here if it is still valid so that we can reprioritize. Thank you!

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 16, 2022
@tivaliy
Copy link

tivaliy commented Jun 13, 2022

Still valid :-)

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jun 13, 2022
@jpoehnelt jpoehnelt removed their assignment Jun 13, 2022
@jbigorra
Copy link

jbigorra commented Aug 2, 2022

No news on this ? 😅 still valid!

@DerGuteWolf
Copy link

Any news? Still valid!

@uriyyo uriyyo mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2023
Open
@Vikr-182
Copy link

any news? still valid!

1 similar comment
@EUGINELETHAL
Copy link

any news? still valid!

@kamikaze
Copy link

the project is abandoned I guess

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted We'd love to have community involvement on this issue. priority: p3 Desirable enhancement or fix. May not be included in next release. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests