Skip to content

Conversation

@R-Sourabh
Copy link
Contributor

Related Issues

hotwax/bopis#471

Short Description and Why It's Useful

  • Updated the DxpProductFeatures component to accept the product as a prop.
  • Removed the use of the productFeature state, and refactored the component code

Screenshots of Visual Changes before/after (If There Are Any)

Is the changes contains any breaking change?

If there are any breaking change include those in the release notes file

  • Yes
  • No

Contribution and Currently Important Rules Acceptance

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @R-Sourabh, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly refactors the DxpProductFeatures component to enhance its modularity and efficiency. By transitioning to a prop-based approach for product data, the component's internal logic is simplified. It also integrates a new, dedicated utility for sorting apparel sizes, which standardizes how size options are presented to the user. These changes collectively aim to improve the component's maintainability and user experience.

Highlights

  • DxpProductFeatures Component Refactor: The DxpProductFeatures component has been updated to accept product data directly as a prop, improving its reusability and simplifying its internal state management.
  • Removed Product Feature State: The component no longer relies on an internal productFeature state, leading to a more streamlined and efficient implementation for handling product features.
  • New Apparel Size Sorter Utility: A new utility (apparel-sorter) has been introduced to intelligently sort apparel sizes, ensuring a consistent and user-friendly display of size options within the component.
  • Component Registration: The new DxpProductFeatures component has been properly exported and registered for global use within the application's component library.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new DxpProductFeatures component and a utility for sorting apparel sizes. The changes are a good step forward, but there are several critical and high-severity issues that need to be addressed. The new component is not reactive to prop changes, and the apparel sorter contains bugs in its sorting logic and lacks type safety. I've provided detailed comments and suggestions to fix these issues and improve the overall code quality.

Comment on lines +38 to +42
onMounted(async () => {
if (props.products && props.products.length > 0) {
extractProductFeatures(props.products);
}
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The component's logic for processing product features is currently in onMounted, which means it only runs once. If the products prop is updated, the component will not react to the changes, leading to stale data being displayed. To fix this, you should use a watcher on the products prop with the immediate: true option. This will run the logic on mount and whenever the products prop changes.

Please also remember to replace onMounted with watch in the import from vue.

watch(() => props.products, (products) => {
  if (products && products.length > 0) {
    extractProductFeatures(products);
  } 
}, { immediate: true });

Comment on lines +82 to +90
/^XXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^9x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^10x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^11x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^12x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

There appear to be copy-paste errors in the regular expressions for sizes from 8x upwards. The number of 'X's in the regex does not match the size it's supposed to represent. For example, 8x points to a regex with 7 'X's. This will cause incorrect sorting for larger apparel sizes.

  • The regex for 8x should have 8 'X's.
  • The regex for 9x should have 9 'X's.
  • ...and so on.
Suggested change
/^XXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^9x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^10x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^11x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^12x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^9x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^10x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^11x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,
/^12x.*$/i,
/^XXXXXXXXXXXXL.*$/i,

Comment on lines +28 to +31
const props = defineProps({
productGroupId: String,
products: Array
});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The props are not strongly typed. products: Array is not specific and can lead to runtime errors. Using PropType from Vue and defining an interface for the product objects will improve type safety and code clarity. This also helps other developers understand what shape of data the component expects.

To apply this, you'll need to import PropType from vue.

interface Product {
  productId: string;
  productFeatures: string[];
  isVariant: string;
}

const props = defineProps({
  productGroupId: String,
  products: {
    type: Array as PropType<Product[]>,
    default: () => []
  }
});

Comment on lines +107 to +115
function findRegexMatch(patterns: any, iteration: any, size: any): any {
if (patterns.length - 1 >= iteration) {
if (size.search(patterns[iteration].regex) >= 0) {
return { regex: patterns[iteration].regex, index: patterns[iteration].index, size: size, sizeVal: parseInt(size) || 0 };
}
return findRegexMatch(patterns, iteration = iteration + 1, size);
}
return { regex: "No Match", index: parseInt(size.replace(/[^\d.-]/g, '')), size: size, sizeVal: parseInt(size) || 0 };
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This function uses any for all its types, contains a side effect in its recursive call (iteration = iteration + 1), and has a bug where index can become NaN for non-numeric sizes that don't match any regex. This can be rewritten as a simple, safer loop. The entire file suffers from a lack of typing, which should be addressed.

Note that matchSizesWithRegexes will need to be updated to call this new function correctly (without the iteration argument).

function findRegexMatch(patterns: { regex: RegExp, index: number }[], size: string): { regex: RegExp | string, index: number, size: string, sizeVal: number } {
  for (const pattern of patterns) {
    if (size.search(pattern.regex) >= 0) {
      return { regex: pattern.regex, index: pattern.index, size: size, sizeVal: parseInt(size) || 0 };
    }
  }
  return { regex: "No Match", index: parseInt(size.replace(/[^\d.-]/g, '')) || 0, size: size, sizeVal: parseInt(size) || 0 };
}

const productFeatures = ref({} as Record<string, string[]>);
const selectedFeatures = ref({} as Record<string, string>);
const selectedProductId = ref('');

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The selectedProductId ref is declared here, but it and its assignments are unused. It appears to be dead code. Please remove this declaration, and also the code blocks that assign to it on lines 94-98 and 104-106.

/^x sm.*$/i,
/^xs.*$/i,
/^.* xs$/i,
/^xs/i,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This regular expression /^xs/i is redundant because the regex /^xs.*$/i on line 34 already covers this case. Removing redundant expressions will make the list cleaner and easier to maintain. There may be other similar cases in this list.

Comment on lines +5 to +6
"lib": ["es2017","dom"]
},

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The formatting of these new lines is a bit off. The lib array could use spaces for readability, and the closing brace of compilerOptions has incorrect indentation.

Suggested change
"lib": ["es2017","dom"]
},
"lib": ["es2017", "dom"]
},

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants