Skip to content

Fix broken require_all_on example in docs #720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025
Merged

Fix broken require_all_on example in docs #720

merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

charles-turner-1
Copy link
Collaborator

Change Summary

  • Changed catalog to older one used in v2021 docs build.
  • Changed a couple of fields - (3 variables, 2 experiments id's) - so the example works

Related issue number

Closes #667

Checklist

  • Unit tests for the changes exist N/A
  • Tests pass on CI N/A
  • Documentation reflects the changes where applicable

@charles-turner-1 charles-turner-1 marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2025 00:00
@charles-turner-1 charles-turner-1 merged commit eb15a2f into main May 13, 2025
10 checks passed
@charles-turner-1 charles-turner-1 deleted the 667-require-all-on branch May 13, 2025 00:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mgrover1 mgrover1 Awaiting requested review from mgrover1 mgrover1 is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug in documentation "Enforce search query criteria via require_all_on argument"
1 participant
@charles-turner-1