Skip to content

bug: use Accept header to return other formats #2948

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

carlinmack
Copy link
Contributor

@carlinmack carlinmack commented Dec 19, 2024

❤️ Thank you for your contribution!

Close #2949

Description

Please describe briefly your pull request.

Checklist

Ticks in all boxes and 🟢 on all GitHub actions status checks are required to merge:

Frontend

Reminder

By using GitHub, you have already agreed to the GitHub’s Terms of Service including that:

  1. You license your contribution under the same terms as the current repository’s license.
  2. You agree that you have the right to license your contribution under the current repository’s license.

@fenekku
Copy link
Contributor

fenekku commented Jan 7, 2025

Hey there 👋 , in conversation with @ptamarit this PR was brought up. Just wanted to mention that InvenioRDM does content-negotiation differently unfortunately. See https://github.com/inveniosoftware/flask-resources/blob/master/flask_resources/content_negotiation.py for how.

@carlinmack carlinmack mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2025
11 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2025

This PR was automatically marked as stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale No activity for more than 60 days. label Apr 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale No activity for more than 60 days.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unable to resolve DOI using HTTP Accept header application/json
3 participants