You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am a huge fan of your library. Currently I am working with the pipeline.integration class. Personally, I think it could be very nice to have the symmetric version of the "integrate" function, therefore a "deintegrate" that is able to remove from the current volume some previously integrated data at a specific position. Indeed, as stated in "BundleFusion" paper from 2017, the TSDF is symmetric, so it is possible to go backward. This is particularly helpful in a pipeline such as the one of BundleFusion, where newly optimized poses can be used to update the model in online fashion.
Thanks in advance,
Marco
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am a huge fan of your library. Currently I am working with the pipeline.integration class. Personally, I think it could be very nice to have the symmetric version of the "integrate" function, therefore a "deintegrate" that is able to remove from the current volume some previously integrated data at a specific position. Indeed, as stated in "BundleFusion" paper from 2017, the TSDF is symmetric, so it is possible to go backward. This is particularly helpful in a pipeline such as the one of BundleFusion, where newly optimized poses can be used to update the model in online fashion.
Thanks in advance,
Marco
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: