We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As detected by the Fedora team, multiple test fails with Python 3.14(-a7).
Sample failure:
_________________________ TestModification.test_append _________________________ self = <test_acls.TestModification object at 0x7f42405dc550> def test_append(self): """Test append a new Entry to the ACL""" acl = posix1e.ACL() e = acl.append() e.tag_type = posix1e.ACL_OTHER ignore_ioerror(errno.EINVAL, acl.calc_mask) str_format = str(e) > self.checkRef(str_format) tests/test_acls.py:589: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ self = <test_acls.TestModification object at 0x7f42405dc550> obj = 'ACL entry for the others' def checkRef(self, obj): """Checks if a given obj has a 'sane' refcount""" if platform.python_implementation() == "PyPy": return ref_cnt = sys.getrefcount(obj) # FIXME: hardcoded value for the max ref count... but I've # seen it overflow on bad reference counting, so it's better # to be safe if ref_cnt < 2 or ref_cnt > 1024: > pytest.fail("Wrong reference count, expected 2-1024 and got %d" % ref_cnt) E Failed: Wrong reference count, expected 2-1024 and got 1 tests/test_acls.py:573: Failed
Reproduced with GH actions: https://github.com/szpak-forks/pylibacl/actions/runs/14450020969/job/40520116539?pr=1#step:7:43
See: #30
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
As detected by the Fedora team, multiple test fails with Python 3.14(-a7).
Sample failure:
Reproduced with GH actions:
https://github.com/szpak-forks/pylibacl/actions/runs/14450020969/job/40520116539?pr=1#step:7:43
See:
#30
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: