Skip to content

Conversation

@buildwithsuhana
Copy link
Contributor

Fixing the ValueError: Incompatible type conversion requested to type int32 for `tf.Variable of type int64. which arose while running the SigLIPBackboneTest.test_backbone_basics test
Changed the dtype from int to int32

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @buildwithsuhana, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical type compatibility issue within the SigLIP layer implementation, specifically targeting a ValueError encountered during testing. The core problem stemmed from TensorFlow's expectation of int32 for certain tf.Variable operations while int64 was implicitly provided. The solution involves explicitly setting the data type of position_ids to "int32", thereby harmonizing the type expectations across different backend frameworks and ensuring the stability of the SigLIP backbone.

Highlights

  • Type Compatibility Fix: Resolved a ValueError related to incompatible type conversion (int64 to int32) that occurred during the SigLIPBackboneTest.test_backbone_basics test.
  • Explicit Dtype Declaration: Changed the dtype for position_ids from a generic int to an explicit "int32" within the build method of the SigLIP layers to ensure correct type handling, especially with TensorFlow.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request fixes a ValueError related to a dtype mismatch in TensorFlow by changing the dtype of position_ids from int to "int32". The change is correct and necessary to ensure backend compatibility. My review includes suggestions to update the accompanying comments, which have become outdated and misleading after this change, to maintain code clarity and consistency as per the style guide.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants