fix: added a clean up to the run dev and add a prod run step #5
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updating the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
7-7: Consider adding build step to prod scriptThe production script should ensure that the application is built before starting. This prevents running an outdated build.
Apply this diff:
- "prod": "npx nuxt start", + "prod": "nuxt build && npx nuxt start",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
6-7: Verify the cleanup impact
Let's verify that the .output directory cleanup doesn't affect other scripts and check for any potential script conflicts.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the usage of these scripts and the .output directory.
Cleanup of .output directory is safe and follows Nuxt.js conventions
The cleanup operation in the dev script is safe because:
- The
.outputdirectory is a standard Nuxt.js build output directory that's meant to be temporary - It's properly listed in
.gitignore, confirming it's a build artifact - No other npm scripts depend on or reference the
devorprodscripts - The cleanup only happens during development (
devscript), not in production
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for .output directory usage and script dependencies
# Check if other scripts reference the .output directory
echo "Checking for .output directory references:"
rg -l "\.output" --type json
# Check if any npm scripts depend on the modified scripts
echo "Checking for script dependencies:"
rg -l "npm run (dev|prod)" --type json
Length of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of package.json to analyze all scripts
echo "Content of package.json scripts:"
cat package.json | jq .scripts
# Check for any Nuxt.js config files that might reference .output
echo -e "\nChecking for Nuxt config files:"
fd -e js -e ts "nuxt.config"
# Look for .gitignore to see if .output is typically ignored
echo -e "\nChecking .gitignore for .output:"
cat .gitignore 2>/dev/null || echo ".gitignore not found"
# Check for any documentation mentioning .output directory
echo -e "\nChecking documentation for .output references:"
rg "\.output" -t md
Length of output: 844
Explain your changes
This change prevents a user from attempting to run a project on production output. This causes issues as the projection and dev modes work differently.
Checklist
🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements