Skip to content

Add node daemonset updateStrategy to helmchart #411

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NeonWizard
Copy link

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
Feature

What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
#410

What testing is done?
Modified helmchart locally, deployed to cluster with custom updateStrategy

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Apr 15, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: NeonWizard / name: Wes (450b926)

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: NeonWizard
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign olemarkus for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @NeonWizard!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/aws-fsx-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/aws-fsx-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from torredil April 15, 2025 22:06
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from wongma7 April 15, 2025 22:06
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Apr 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @NeonWizard. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 30, 2025
@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

Hi @torredil and @wongma7, apologies on the delay with getting the CLA signed, but this should be good to go now! Could I get an estimation on when you might be able to get this PR moving? Thank you

@kuba-wolf
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @NeonWizard can you squash the 3 commits into a singular commit?

@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

Hi @NeonWizard can you squash the 3 commits into a singular commit?

Sure, let me also update the changelog

@kuba-wolf
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @NeonWizard can you squash the 3 commits into a singular commit?

Sure, let me also update the changelog

If you're going to update the changelog you should also update the helm chart to create a new helm version. See here for an example: #378

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 1, 2025
@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

Hi @NeonWizard can you squash the 3 commits into a singular commit?

Sure, let me also update the changelog

If you're going to update the changelog you should also update the helm chart to create a new helm version. See here for an example: #378

Updated!

@kuba-wolf
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 1, 2025
@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

/retest

@kuba-wolf
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @NeonWizard, We're doing a new release today which will involve a new helm chart. Just for simplicity, we won't be pulling this in, so the helm chart version will be outdated in this PR. We have another candidate helm chart change from another contributor, if you remove the helm chart version specific changes we can make a new helm chart release with both of your changes. Thanks for being patient, sorry for the confusion

@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

Hi @NeonWizard, We're doing a new release today which will involve a new helm chart. Just for simplicity, we won't be pulling this in, so the helm chart version will be outdated in this PR. We have another candidate helm chart change from another contributor, if you remove the helm chart version specific changes we can make a new helm chart release with both of your changes. Thanks for being patient, sorry for the confusion

Sounds good! I'll have that pushed shortly

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 2, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 4, 2025
@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

/retest

@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

Hey @kuba-wolf, the E2E tests seem to be repeatedly failing for unrelated errors. Could you take a look? And do you have an ETA on when we can get this released? Thanks

@kuba-wolf
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @NeonWizard, I recently left AWS. Sorry for not getting to this while I was there, it ended up being a very busy wrap up.

Error: master-us-west-2a.spec.image: Invalid value: "099720109477/ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-focal-20.04-amd64-server-20250429": image specified is invalid: "099720109477/ubuntu/images/hvm-ssd/ubuntu-focal-20.04-amd64-server-20250429"

It seems to me like the ami that was being used is no longer accessible, a new one needs to be pinned. Long term the goal should be to move off pinning the ami altogether.

/assign @khoang98

@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

Hi @khoang98, could I get an ETA on this please? The E2E tests also seem to be having an infra failure if you could help look into that. Thank you

@khoang98
Copy link
Contributor

/test pull-aws-fsx-csi-driver-e2e

@khoang98
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not seeing any pinned ubuntu AMIs in our e2e framework - suspecting that https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/pull/17444/files might help w this

@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@NeonWizard
Copy link
Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@NeonWizard: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-aws-fsx-csi-driver-e2e 450b926 link true /test pull-aws-fsx-csi-driver-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@khoang98
Copy link
Contributor

I'm working on bumping our e2e dependencies in a different PR to use a more recent version of kops - seeing some test failures as a result. This is WIP

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants