Skip to content

⚠️ Restructure classRef field in Cluster.spec.topology #12235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented May 16, 2025

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #11500
Part of #10852

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from elmiko and Jont828 May 16, 2025 15:35
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 16, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request May 16, 2025
72 tasks
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass label May 16, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label May 16, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title ⚠️ Restructure classRef field in Cluster.spec.topology [WIP] ⚠️ Restructure classRef field in Cluster.spec.topology May 16, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 16, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-restructure-class-ref branch from 47e570d to 6d04af6 Compare May 16, 2025 15:42
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] ⚠️ Restructure classRef field in Cluster.spec.topology ⚠️ Restructure classRef field in Cluster.spec.topology May 16, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 16, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

sbueringer commented May 16, 2025

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

/hold
for API review + testing

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 16, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-restructure-class-ref branch 2 times, most recently from 73d1d65 to c5b035e Compare May 16, 2025 15:57
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-restructure-class-ref branch from c5b035e to 0f149c2 Compare May 16, 2025 15:59
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

changes lgtm, I will take another look after API review + changes for build in variables

@sbueringer sbueringer added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label May 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 19, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

@fabriziopandini @JoelSpeed PTAL :)

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-restructure-class-ref branch from 7c3c8d1 to 41f0232 Compare May 19, 2025 15:39
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/assign @fabriziopandini

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c931a100303e4db3e3fc117df009da41eeccb99e

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Are we planning to backport the fix to v1beta1 regex/maxlength for the classNamespace field?

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

I'll open a cherry-pick PR. Can one of you approve the PR please? :)

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Thanks @sbueringer

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 20, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Thx! Cherry-pick PR #12252

Would be good to merge ASAP so we can include it in the patch release today

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 20, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 72b19b1 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 20, 2025
20 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.11 milestone May 20, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-restructure-class-ref branch May 20, 2025 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

v1beta2: Class Namespace API change
4 participants