Skip to content

⚠️ Make clusterName field in ClusterResourceSetBinding required #12276

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
Makes the clusterName field in CRSB required as documented in the linked issue

This is safe to do because the field has been set by CRS / CRSB controllers since Cluster API v1.4

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #8267
Part of #10852

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels May 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from chrischdi May 23, 2025 08:33
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 23, 2025
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-make-crsb-cluster-name-required branch from 429225f to c59b1f5 Compare May 23, 2025 08:33
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/clusterresourceset Issues or PRs related to clusterresourcesets label May 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label May 23, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title Make clusterName field in ClusterResourceSetBinding required ⚠️ Make clusterName field in ClusterResourceSetBinding required May 23, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request May 23, 2025
72 tasks
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 639fb70ddcd0c0fe27a6e50fbcdbbe3f40a1d6a9

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 80abd39 into kubernetes-sigs:main May 23, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.11 milestone May 23, 2025
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-make-crsb-cluster-name-required branch May 23, 2025 12:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clusterresourceset Issues or PRs related to clusterresourcesets cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When the clusterresourcesetbinding is v1beta2, set the clusterName field to be required.
3 participants