Skip to content

Follow UP PR : Can we change the service configuration instead? It will avoid the fake ResetFailed interface we add here. #20741

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
medyagh opened this issue May 12, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Follow UP PR : Can we change the service configuration instead? It will avoid the fake ResetFailed interface we add here. #20741

medyagh opened this issue May 12, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
@ComradeProgrammer

Comments

@medyagh
Copy link
Member

medyagh commented May 12, 2025 •
edited
Loading 

          Can we change the service configuration instead? It will avoid the fake ResetFailed interface we add here.

Originally posted by @nirs in #20720 (comment)

we need a follow up PR for this
#20720
@nirs
Copy link
Contributor

nirs commented May 12, 2025

Or better find why we see bust of start events. If the services behave properly starting a service should block until the service is ready and starting another service depending on the first one should not fail.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ComradeProgrammer ComradeProgrammer

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@nirs @medyagh @ComradeProgrammer