Skip to content

Restore ability to manually run 5k tests on PR #34546

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2025

Conversation

serathius
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @wojtek-t @mborsz

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Mar 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from mm4tt and wojtek-t March 19, 2025 11:00
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Mar 19, 2025
# Fork of ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-performance
- name: ci-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-performance-manual
cluster: k8s-infra-prow-build
always_run: false
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Taken always_run, max_concurrency, branches from other optional presubmits like pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-scale

base_ref: master
path_alias: k8s.io/perf-tests
annotations:
testgrid-dashboards: presubmits-kubernetes-scalability
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replaced annotations

- master
- main
decorate: true
path_alias: k8s.io/kubernetes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed k8s.io/kubernetes from extra_refs and moved there as path_alias

@mborsz
Copy link
Member

mborsz commented Mar 19, 2025

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mborsz, serathius

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8798c11 into kubernetes:master Mar 19, 2025
7 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@serathius: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace default at cluster test-infra-trusted using the following files:

  • key sig-scalability-presubmit-jobs.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-scalability/sig-scalability-presubmit-jobs.yaml

In response to this:

/assign @wojtek-t @mborsz

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

- --env=KUBE_DNS_MEMORY_LIMIT=300Mi
- --extract=ci/fast/latest-fast
- --gcp-nodes=5000
- --gcp-project-type=scalability-scale-project
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is only one of these. So running this can disrupt the periodics?

kubernetes/kubernetes#130968

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Possibly, however we don't want to increase capacity for 5k tests.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clarification Note: We use SIG K8s Infra managed projects now, but we still need GCP to approve quota on a project like this, and I'm also not sure if we want to either.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm concerned about disrupting the release-informing periodics though.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this different before removing the Job? The goal of manual scalability tests is to test high risk performance changes, like new etcd minor release. I expect we only have 1-2 features like this in release cycle.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was this different before removing the Job? The goal of manual scalability tests is to test high risk performance changes, like new etcd minor release. I expect we only have 1-2 features like this in release cycle.

Looks like it:
https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/pull/33229/files#diff-07d9a5c0eb2050cafb795db08b673175226c577365bcfe39dc7025ab87300898L133

    - --gcp-project-type=scalability-presubmit-5k-project

I guess we had another pool for 5k scale presubmit?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kubernetes/k8s.io#7929 for rolling-forward when we can

Copy link
Member

@BenTheElder BenTheElder Mar 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants