Skip to content

Replace foxglove references to Lichtblick #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024
Merged

Replace foxglove references to Lichtblick #1

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 20, 2024

Conversation

luluiz
Copy link
Member

@luluiz luluiz commented Sep 18, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • replaced foxglove refs to lichblick
  • upgraded deps
  • fixed lint issue to use #varName instead private varName
  • yarn lint
  • yarn lint:ci
  • yarn test
  • yarn build
  • yarn clean

@luluiz
updated refs from foxglove to lichtblick and upgraded libs
d9318f2 
Signed-off-by: Luiz Bezerra <luiz.bezerra@ctw.bmwgroup.com>
@luluiz
fixed lint issue to use #varNames instead private varName
4616390 
Signed-off-by: Luiz Bezerra <luiz.bezerra@ctw.bmwgroup.com>
@luluiz
updated node engine in package to >= 16
759909b 
Signed-off-by: Luiz Bezerra <luiz.bezerra@ctw.bmwgroup.com>
@luluiz
forcing push
86ae1ec
@luluiz
forcing push
9251684
aneuwald-ctw
aneuwald-ctw approved these changes Sep 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@aneuwald-ctw aneuwald-ctw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Good catch of removing ts-jest

@luluiz luluiz merged commit 96ba329 into main Sep 20, 2024
1 check passed
@luluiz luluiz deleted the replace-foxglove-references-to-lichtblick branch September 20, 2024 09:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aneuwald-ctw aneuwald-ctw aneuwald-ctw approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@luluiz @aneuwald-ctw