Skip to content

Conversation

Roasbeef
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Roasbeef Roasbeef added this to the v0.19.0 milestone Mar 18, 2025
Roasbeef and others added 28 commits March 18, 2025 11:44
In this commit, we change LinkDirection to be a type alias. This makes
creating wrapper structs/interfaces easier, as we don't need to leak
htlcswitch.LinkDirection, instead we can accept a bool.
In this commit, we add an implementation of a new interface the rbf coop
state machine needs. We take care to accept interfaces everywhere, to
make this easier to test, and decouple from the concrete types we'll end
up using elsewhere.
Similar to the last commit, in this commit, we make a daemon adapter
impl for lnd. We'll use this for any future protofsm based state
machine.
We don't return an error on broadcast fail as the broadcast might have
failed due to insufficient fees, or inability to be replaced, which may
happen when one side attempts to unnecessarily bump their coop close
fee.
With this commit, we make sure we set the right height hint, even if the
channel is a zero conf channel.
In this commit, we update `chooseDeliveryScript` to generate a new
script if needed. This allows us to fold in a few other lines that
always followed this function into this expanded function.

The tests have been updated accordingly.
This'll be useful to communicate what the new fee rate is to an RPC caller.
If we go to close while the channel is already flushed, we might get an extra event, so we can safely ignore it and do a self state transition.
Both these messages now carry the address of both parties, so you can
update an address without needing to send shutdown again.
In this commit, we implement the latest version of the RBF loop as
described in the spec. We remove the self loop back based on sending or
receiving shutdown. Instead, from the ClosePending state, we can trigger
a new loop by sending SendOfferEvent (we bump), or OfferReceivedEvent
(they bump).

We also update the rbf state machine w/ the new close addr logic. This
log ensures that the remote party always sends our current address, and
that if they send a new address, we'll update our view of it, and
counter sign the correct transaction.

We also add a CloseErr state. With this new state, we can ensure that
we're able to properly report errors back to the RPC client, and also
optionally force a reconnection or send a warning to the remote party.
In this commit, we implement a special case for OP_RETURN scripts
outlined in the spec. If a party decides that its output will be too
small even after the dust check, then they can opt to set it to zero by sending an `OP_RETURN` as their script.
In this commit, we update the RBF state machine to handle early offer
cases. This can happen if after we send out shutdown (to kick things
off), the remote party sends their offer early. This can also happen if
their outgoing shutdown (to ACK ours) was delayed for w/e reason, and we
get their offer first.

The alternative was to modify the state machine itself, but we feel that
handling this early case is better in line with the Robustness principle.
In this commit, we add an upfront check for `SendWhen` predicates before
deciding to launch a goroutine. This ensures that when a message comes
along that is already ready to send, we do the send in a synchronous
manner.
In the next commit, we'll start checking feature bits to decide how to
init the chan closer.

In the future, we can move the current chan closer handling logic into
an `MsgEndpoint`, which'll allow us to get rid of the explicit chan
closer map and direct handling.
In this commit, we use the interfaces we created in the prior commit to
make a new method capable of spinning up the new rbf coop closer.
In this commit, we add a new composite chanCloserFsm type. This'll allow
us to store a single value that might be a negotiator or and rbf-er.

In a follow up commit, we'll use this to conditionally create the new
rbf closer.
Roasbeef added 19 commits March 18, 2025 11:44
In this commit, we fully integrate the new RBF close state machine into
the peer.

For the restart case after shutdown, we can short circuit the existing
logic as the new FSM will handle retransmitting the shutdown message
itself, and doesn't need to delegate that duty to the link.

Unlike the existing state machine, we're able to restart the flow to
sign a coop close with a new higher fee rate. In this case, we can now
send multiple updates to the RPC caller, one for each newly singed coop
close transaction.

To implement the async flush case, we'll launch a new goroutine to wait
until the state machine reaches the `ChannelFlushing` state, then we'll
register the hook. We don't do this at start up, as otherwise the
channel may _already_ be flushed, triggering an invalid state
transition.
For now, we disallow the option to be used with the taproot chans
option, as the new flow hasn't yet been updated for nonce usage.
This fixes some existing race conditions, as the `finalizeChanClosure`
function was being called from outside the main event loop.
If we hit an error, we want to wipe the state machine state, which also
includes removing the old endpoint.
This'll allow us to notify the caller each time a new coop close
transaction with a higher fee rate is signed.
Resp is always nil, so we actually need to log event.Update here.
In this commit, we extend `CloseChannelAssertPending` with new args that
returns the raw close status update (as we have more things we'd like to
assert), and also allows us to pass in a custom fee rate.
We'll properly handle a protocol error due to user input by halting, and
sending the error back to the user.

When a user goes to issue a new update, based on which state we're in,
we'll either kick off the shutdown, or attempt a new offer. This matches
the new spec update where we'll only send `Shutdown` once per
connection.
In this commit, we alter the existing co-op close flow to enable RBF
bumps after re connection. With the new RBF close flow, it's possible
that after a success round _and_ a re connection, either side wants to do
another fee bump. Typically we route these requests through the switch,
but in this case, the link no longer exists in the switch, so any
requests to fee bump again would find that the link doesn't exist.

In this commit, we implement a work around wherein if we have an RBF
chan closer active, and the link isn't in the switch, then we just route
the request directly to the chan closer via the peer. Once we have the
chan closer, we can use the exact same flow as prior.
The itest has both sides try to close multiple times, each time with
increasing fee rates. We also test the reconnection case, bad RBF
updates, and instances where the local party can't actually pay for
fees.
With this commit, we make sure we set the right height hint, even if the
channel is a zero conf channel.
This fixes an issue in the itests in the restart case. We'd see an error
like:
```
2025-03-12 23:41:10.754 [ERR] PFSM state_machine.go:661: FSM(rbf_chan_closer(2f20725d9004f7fda7ef280f77dd8d419fd6669bda1a5231dd58d6f6597066e0:0)): Unable to apply event err="invalid state transition: received *chancloser.SendOfferEvent while in ClosingNegotiation(local=LocalOfferSent(proposed_fee=0.00000193 BTC), remote=ClosePending(txid=07229915459cb439bdb8ad4f5bf112dc6f42fca0192ea16a7d6dd05e607b92ae, party=Remote, fee_rate=1 sat/vb))"
```

We resolve this by waiting to send in the new request unil the old one
has been completed.
Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM🚢

check commits failed with no space left on device, so it's unrelated.

@Roasbeef Roasbeef merged commit ea050d0 into master Mar 19, 2025
64 of 67 checks passed
; Set to disable experimental endorsement signaling.
; protocol.no-experimental-endorsement=false

; Set to disable support for RBF based coop close.
Copy link
Contributor

@twofaktor twofaktor May 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

*Set to "enable" support for RBF based coop close.

#9857

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants