Skip to content

Conversation

yyforyongyu
Copy link
Member

When running aider I'd use both code_contribution_guidelines.md and docs/code_formatting_rules.md as the convention file, while only a portion of code_contribution_guidelines.md is used, which can waste tokens.

This PR moves all the coding related requirements into one file to guide aider, so one can add the line to its config,

read: ["docs/development_guidelines.md"]

The ## Testing section is expanded with details on how to run the unit test, so the aider will produce sth like,

You might want to run the tests again to confirm everything is working as expected:

make unit pkg=sweep


Tokens: 57k sent, 239 received.

make unit pkg=sweep
Run shell command? (Y)es/(N)o/(D)on't ask again [Yes]:

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu added documentation Documentation changes that do not affect code behaviour no-itest no-changelog size/micro small bug fix or feature, less than 15 mins of review, less than 250 labels Apr 9, 2025
@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu requested a review from Copilot April 9, 2025 13:26
@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu self-assigned this Apr 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

docs/code_formatting_rules.md:1

  • Since this file has been removed, please ensure that all references to docs/code_formatting_rules.md elsewhere in the repository have been updated to point to the new development guidelines file.
# Code formatting rules

.github/pull_request_template.md:15

  • Verify that the section 'code-documentation-and-commenting' exists in the new development_guidelines.md file, and update the link if needed.
- [ ] The change obeys the [Code Documentation and Commenting](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/blob/master/docs/development_guidelines.md#code-documentation-and-commenting) guidelines, and lines wrap at 80.

docs/code_contribution_guidelines.md:141

  • Ensure that any test coverage guidelines previously found in the Testing section are adequately referenced or integrated into the new consolidated development guidelines, to avoid missing test requirements.
## Development Guidelines

Copy link
Collaborator

@guggero guggero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thank you! LGTM 🎉

Copy link
Collaborator

@bitromortac bitromortac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🤖 nice idea!

There are two broken links, which need changes

Blocks of code within `lnd` should be segmented into logical stanzas of
operation. Such spacing makes the code easier to follow at a skim, and reduces
unnecessary line noise. Coupled with the commenting scheme specified in the
[contribution guide](./code_contribution_guidelines.md#code-documentation-and-commenting),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That link broke, we can just keep the # part, as this references a section in this doc

There is also a line that needs update in review.md, I think:

    - Is the flow of the commits easy to understand? Does the order make sense?
      See the [code development
      guidelines](docs/development_guidelines.md#ideal-git-commit-structure) for
      more information on this.

I'm not sure if this needs to be relative to the root dir or relative to docs.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice thanks!

This file focuses on the requirements and steps needed to make an
acceptable PR.
@guggero guggero merged commit ff6f98a into lightningnetwork:master Apr 14, 2025
21 of 22 checks passed
@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu deleted the add-aider branch April 14, 2025 09:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Documentation changes that do not affect code behaviour no-changelog no-itest size/micro small bug fix or feature, less than 15 mins of review, less than 250

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants