Skip to content

Conversation

ziggie1984
Copy link
Collaborator

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 commented May 19, 2025

This PR is the start of a refactor series to finally support both payment backends out of the box for LND.

This PR starts with unifying the PaymentDB code which is currently splitted across multiple files and introducing a new KVPaymentDB struct at the server level. Apart from the second commit which adds a new DB to the server level (but does not use it yet) all of the changes are only refactors so nothing changed.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 19, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 self-assigned this May 19, 2025
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 added this to the v0.20.0 milestone May 19, 2025
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch from fb6f2c6 to 3635b27 Compare May 19, 2025 11:13
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2025 11:13
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 added refactoring payments Related to invoices/payments labels May 19, 2025
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 requested a review from bhandras May 19, 2025 11:14
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch from 3635b27 to cedd931 Compare May 19, 2025 13:43
@saubyk saubyk moved this to In progress in lnd v0.20 May 19, 2025
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 requested review from yyforyongyu and ellemouton and removed request for bhandras May 19, 2025 15:31
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch 5 times, most recently from 6c85629 to da88254 Compare May 20, 2025 09:27
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch from da88254 to 3a02bcd Compare May 21, 2025 06:52
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 moved this from In progress to In review in lnd v0.20 May 21, 2025
@lightninglabs-deploy
Copy link

@yyforyongyu: review reminder
@ziggie1984, remember to re-request review from reviewers when ready

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch 2 times, most recently from d357969 to d8cb28e Compare August 1, 2025 15:47
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 requested a review from ellemouton August 1, 2025 15:48
We rename the file to payment_kv_store to highlight that this
is the kv implementation of the payment db backend.
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch 2 times, most recently from e22c3bd to a2705a0 Compare August 2, 2025 09:12
In the following commits we will gradually unify the current
payment db operations into an interface to later down the road
support both backends (sql+kv).
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch from a2705a0 to 67dd72d Compare August 2, 2025 09:27
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch from 67dd72d to 1f2efd2 Compare August 2, 2025 10:03
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the refactor-payments-code branch from 1f2efd2 to 84b2a94 Compare August 2, 2025 11:25
Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty clean and straightforward! Can you confirm the itest failure is pre-existing? Guess it's related to #9912.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🫡

Copy link
Collaborator

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, actually, quick question: should we not instead rename the test file s.t. it doesnt include 'kv' in the name? cause wont we want to run the unit tests against all backend types depending on build flags (like is done in graph/db/graph_test.go)?

@ziggie1984
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ah, actually, quick question: should we not instead rename the test file s.t. it doesnt include 'kv' in the name? cause wont we want to run the unit tests against all backend types depending on build flags (like is done in graph/db/graph_test.go)?

yes we will run them against the interface backend, but this will be part of a future commit. So we will move all tests which can run against all backends into a separate file in the paymentsDB package which will be introduced later.

@ellemouton
Copy link
Collaborator

@ziggie1984 - cool, sgtm 👍

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu merged commit 84b2a94 into lightningnetwork:master Aug 4, 2025
35 of 39 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In review to Done in lnd v0.20 Aug 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-changelog payments Related to invoices/payments refactoring
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants