Skip to content

Conversation

ziggie1984
Copy link
Collaborator

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 commented Jun 6, 2025

This lead to the case that we would always record a HTLC
two times in the decayed log (batch-replay bucket) protection which is not necessary
in the first place.

We already do it for the settle/fail package:

lnd/htlcswitch/link.go

Lines 3626 to 3628 in 4a7cd00

if len(fwdPkg.SettleFails) == 0 {
return
}

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 6, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 self-assigned this Jun 6, 2025
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 added this to the v0.19.2 milestone Jun 6, 2025
Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would always record a HTLC two times in the decayed log (batch-replay bucket) protection

When there are no Adds it's a noop?

@ziggie1984
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ziggie1984 commented Jun 6, 2025

I actually verified on my local node and HTLC will be persisted 2 times in the batch-reply log, here is the flow:

decodeResps, sphinxErr := l.cfg.DecodeHopIterators(
(is called)

We start the batch_replay tx here:

tx := p.router.BeginTxn(id, batchSize)

it persist the empty batch in the batch-reply here:

packets, replays, err := tx.Commit()

which happens here:

https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-onion/blob/8b40adf04ab9f081e198b05320843ebde96277c6/sphinx.go#L828

and writes it eventually here:

return batchReplayBkt.Put(b.ID, replayBuf.Bytes())

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2025
Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I actually verified on my local node and HTLC will be persisted 2 times in the batch-reply log, here is the flow:

Nice analysis! I'm wondering why would call processRemoteAdds with empty ADDs?

func (l *channelLink) processRemoteAdds(fwdPkg *channeldb.FwdPkg) {
// Exit early if there are no adds to process.
if len(fwdPkg.Adds) == 0 {
return
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add a log here since it's unexpected to have empty Adds here

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 Jun 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not unexpeted tho, every HTLC will eventually be resolved and then the fwd has only Fail/Settles no ADDs, I can add a trace if you want ? In case no other HTLC is added while the first one is Removed.

FWD PKG 1 => adds the invoming HTLC onto the Channel

FWD PKG 2 => resolves the HTLC via an FAIL/Settle and has 0 ADDs in the single HTLC flow.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah right - we sort just move the empty check into the methods, so they are always called.

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the exit-early-for-fwd-adds branch from a7219c0 to d82b1b8 Compare June 9, 2025 06:57
This lead to the case that we would always record a HTLC
two times in the decayed log protection which is not necessary
in the first place.
@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 force-pushed the exit-early-for-fwd-adds branch from d82b1b8 to 6feed32 Compare June 9, 2025 07:17
Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM🙏

func (l *channelLink) processRemoteAdds(fwdPkg *channeldb.FwdPkg) {
// Exit early if there are no adds to process.
if len(fwdPkg.Adds) == 0 {
return
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah right - we sort just move the empty check into the methods, so they are always called.

@ziggie1984 ziggie1984 requested review from Roasbeef and removed request for bhandras June 10, 2025 21:18
Copy link
Member

@Roasbeef Roasbeef left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ☃️

@Roasbeef Roasbeef merged commit 92a5d35 into lightningnetwork:master Jun 10, 2025
33 of 38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants