Skip to content

code-update-standardization #29

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

vlussenburg
Copy link
Collaborator

@vlussenburg vlussenburg commented May 13, 2025

✨ PR Description

Purpose: This PR implements minor improvements and adds timestamps to the billing process across multiple services.

Main changes:

  • Fixed token formatting in frontend and added TODO for order history
  • Added timestamp field to billing requests and responses
  • Implemented error logging in Java service and fixed a typo in date field name

Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream.
AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies. Please verify before using. We’d love your feedback! 🚀

Copy link

@gitstream-cm gitstream-cm bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR contains a TODO statement. Please check to see if they should be removed.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 13, 2025

Please mark which AI tools you used for this PR by checking the appropriate boxes:

  • GitHub Copilot
  • Cursor
  • ChatGPT
  • Tabnine
  • JetBrains AI Assistant
  • VSCode IntelliCode
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • Other AI tool
  • No AI tools were used

Tip: If you want to avoid this comment in the future, you can add a label of the format 🤖 ai-* when creating your PR.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 13, 2025

✨ PR Review

General Feedback

The PR introduces synchronization between Java and C# services for date tracking in the billing process. While this is a good feature addition, there are several issues including a typo in the date field name ("dats" vs "date"), a missing space in the Authorization token, and inconsistent error handling. The PR also removes an admin user from the auth system and adds gitStream workflow automation. These changes should be carefully reviewed for potential security implications.

File: services/orders-java/src/main/java/com/example/orders/controller/OrderController.java
Bug - Field Name Mismatch

Details

Problem: Field Name Mismatch - There's a mismatch between the Java and C# implementations for the date field name. In OrderController.java the field name is "dats" but in BillingController.cs it's "date", which will cause the timestamp data to be lost or ignored by the C# service.
Fix: Correct the field name in the Java service to match the C# implementation
Why: The JSON field name doesn't match between services, breaking the date tracking feature

public class OrderController {
    JSONObject payload = new JSONObject();
    payload.put("username", username);
    payload.put("productId", productId);
    payload.put("quantity", quantity);
-    payload.put("dats", Instant.now().toString());
+    payload.put("date", Instant.now().toString());

File: frontend/public/app.js
Bug - Authorization Header Error

Details

Problem: Authorization Header Error - The Authorization header in the placeOrder function is missing a space between "Bearer" and the token, which will result in authentication failures.
Fix: Add the missing space between "Bearer" and the token in the Authorization header
Why: The JWT token format requires a space between "Bearer" and the token value

async function placeOrder() {
     method: "POST",
     headers: {
       "Content-Type": "application/json",
-      "Authorization": "Bearer" + token
+      "Authorization": "Bearer " + token
     },
     body: JSON.stringify({ productId, quantity }),
   });

File: services/auth-python/app.py
Security - Removed Admin User

Details

Problem: Removed Admin User - The PR removes the admin user from the USER_DB dictionary. This could be intentional for security reasons or a mistake. Since admin accounts often have elevated privileges, removing it without proper consideration or migration plan might impact system administration capabilities.
Fix: Review if admin user removal was intentional and ensure there's an alternative way to perform admin operations if needed
Why: Removing the admin user without proper migration could lead to loss of administrative access

# Need to confirm whether admin removal was intentional before suggesting code changes

Generated by LinearB AI and added by gitStream.
AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies. Please verify before using. We’d love your feedback! 🚀

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 13, 2025

This PR is missing a Jira ticket reference in the title or description.
Please add a Jira ticket reference to the title or description of this PR.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 13, 2025

Hello vlussenburg 👋 Thanks for making your first PR, and welcome to our project!
Our mentor team has automatically been assigned to review this PR and guide you through the process.
Please reach out to that team if you have questions about the next steps.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 13, 2025

Be a life saver 🛟 by adding a screenshot of the changes you made.

Copy link

gitstream-cm bot commented May 13, 2025

🥷 Code experts: cghyzel, amitmohleji

cghyzel, amitmohleji have most 👩‍💻 activity in the files.
cghyzel, amitmohleji have most 🧠 knowledge in the files.

See details

frontend/public/app.js

Activity based on git-commit:

cghyzel amitmohleji
MAY
APR
MAR 33 additions & 0 deletions
FEB
JAN
DEC

Knowledge based on git-blame:
amitmohleji: 100%

frontend/public/index.html

Activity based on git-commit:

cghyzel amitmohleji
MAY
APR
MAR 20 additions & 0 deletions
FEB
JAN
DEC

Knowledge based on git-blame:
amitmohleji: 100%

services/auth-python/app/auth.py

Activity based on git-commit:

cghyzel amitmohleji
MAY
APR
MAR
FEB 33 additions & 0 deletions
JAN
DEC

Knowledge based on git-blame:
cghyzel: 100%

services/billing-csharp/Controllers/BillingController.cs

Activity based on git-commit:

cghyzel amitmohleji
MAY
APR
MAR 45 additions & 0 deletions
FEB
JAN
DEC

Knowledge based on git-blame:
cghyzel: 100%

services/orders-java/src/main/java/com/example/orders/controller/OrderController.java

Activity based on git-commit:

cghyzel amitmohleji
MAY 75 additions & 0 deletions
APR
MAR
FEB
JAN
DEC

Knowledge based on git-blame:
cghyzel: 100%

To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs

@gitstream-cm gitstream-cm bot requested review from cghyzel and amitmohleji May 13, 2025 03:30
@vlussenburg vlussenburg deleted the code-update-standardization branch May 14, 2025 03:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants