Skip to content

More statistics to consider #3

@m-clark

Description

@m-clark

While I think there is already enough for most needs, we can always add more if they are straightforward to calculate. If so, perhaps this should be an optional argument with default to FALSE.

  • Yule/Phi (will not call it Matthews!)
  • Tetrachoric correlation (probably not due to heavy lifting)
  • AUC (see psych implementation)
  • d'
  • Peirce's coefficient (because he was awesome)
  • Jaccard (still notably used in some disciplines)
  • Odds ratio
  • Others

Possibly separate correlation coefficients
Preference for those that are zero if statistically independent

See this historical overview for a ridiculous number of things to calculate: A Survey of Binary Similarity and Distance Measures Seung-Seok Choi, Sung-Hyuk Cha, Charles C. Tappert

Also:
Warrens, Matthijs (2008), On Association Coefficients for 2x2 Tables and Properties That Do Not Depend on the Marginal Distributions.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions