You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/e2e_journal_experiment/experiment_issues.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Experiments on different [variations of fnn](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet
2
2
**training phase only**
3
3
- We initially ran 3 models on cuda:1 and 3 models on cuda:3, resulting in a training time of ~3 hours per epoch.
4
4
- Running 6 models in parallel led to CPU usage [exceeding 97%](https://github.com/mahdis-saeedi/OpeNTF/blob/main/docs/e2e_journal_experiment/cpu%26gpu_usage/cpu_6models_2gpus.txt) across all 224 cores.
5
-
- We terminated 3 runs on cuda:3, which reduced CPU usage to ~7% per core, but it was not stable and increased to more than 95% again.
5
+
- We terminated 3 runs on cuda:3, which reduced CPU usage to [~6%](https://github.com/mahdis-saeedi/OpeNTF/blob/main/docs/e2e_journal_experiment/cpu%26gpu_usage/cpu_3models_1gpu_not_stable.txt) per core, but it was not stable and increased to more than 95% again.
6
6
- We then launched a new run on cuda:3, increasing the batch size from 1,000 to 10,000, and started monitoring GPU and CPU utilization.
0 commit comments